On January 14, 2008, a video produced by the
Church of Scientology featuring an interview with Tom Cruise, was leaked to the
Internet and uploaded on YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFBZ_uAbxS0&noredirect=1
The Church of Scientology issued a copyright
violation claim against YouTube requesting the removal of the video. Shortly
thereafter, the Hacktivist group Anonymous voiced its criticism of Scientology
and began attacking the Church. Members of Anonymous coordinated “Project
Chanology”, which consisted of a series of denial of service attacks against
Scientology websites, prank calls to the Dianetics hotline, and black faxes to
Scientology centers.
Calling the action by the Church of
Scientology a form of Internet censorship, on January 21, 2008, Anonymous
announced its intentions via a video posted to YouTube entitled "Message
to Scientology" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ declaring "war" against the Church
of Scientology. The purpose of the protest was to protect the freedom of speech
and freedom of the internet.
The question at hand is whether it is
acceptable for Anonymous to disrupt the Church of Scientology with their
tactics in order to protect the freedom of speech and the freedom of the
internet.
I agree with the actions of Anonymous. Their
protest has made people throughout the world take a closer look at Scientology
and their tactics toward those that dare speak out against them or journalists
that write negative articles. Scientology is known as the most litigious
organization in the world. They are known to file law suits and harass anyone
or any organization that sheds them in a negative light. These cases are
designed to suppress freedom of expression and scare people from stating the
truth that they are more of a cult than a “church”. Although one can debate that
same fact about many other so called “main stream” religions.
In the years since its inception, the Church
of Scientology's lawsuits filed against newspapers, magazines, government
agencies such as the IRS and individuals have numbered in the thousands. In
1991, Time magazine estimated that the Church spends an average of about $20
million per year on various legal actions [1] and it is the only client of
several law firms. According to a U.S. District Court Memorandum of Decision in
1993, Scientologists "have abused the federal court system by using it,
inter alia (among other things), to destroy their opponents, rather than to
resolve an actual dispute over trademark law or any other legal matter. This
constitutes 'extraordinary, malicious, wanton, and oppressive conduct. It is
clear that the Church of Scientology has sought to harass defendants and
destroy their critics through excessive litigation and other highly
questionable litigation tactics.
The Church of Scientology has infiltrated the
FBI, IRS and over one hundred other government agencies with members of their
organization that abuse their power and position to do harm to those that
criticize or oppose them. [2] The “We are Legion Video” highlights the case of
a twenty year old young man named Brian Metternbrink that learned about
Anonymous’ war against Scientology on 4chan.org. Brian is not a bad person. He
appears to come from a good family. Brian states that he would never do
anything that would hurt anyone. Brian downloaded a program called “Low Orbit
Ion Cannon” and used it to launch a denial of service attack on the Scientology
web site. The attack only lasted a few hours. Brian was sentenced to one year
in jail and one year of supervised release in which he was not allowed to touch
a computer. There are rapists, pedophiles, murderers, people that drive drunk
and kill people that get a lighter sentence. Brian’s sentence is an example of
the reach and power of Scientology.
Obviously when you do battle against the
Church of Scientology it is not a level playing field. They use our government
and legal system to hurt people.
Footnotes and references available upon request.
No comments:
Post a Comment