Situation: Edward Snowden
after weeks of thoughts decided to blow the whistle of the U.S government
spying on its own citizens.
Claim: in 2013, a guy named
Edward Snowden was at the center of front pages in many new outlets, he
believed that the government was acting the public will and in secret and
therefore had to make it public and goes against the U.S constitution, his
moral righteousness dictated for him that the U.S government should never have
acted against innocent citizens nor should they have had access to our phone
conversations nor our social media sites that we visit daily, I believe that
Edward Snowden was wrong overall.
Argument: NSA, National
Security Agency has considered as betrayed and espionage against the country, although
I stand with the fact that Edward Snowden should not have made this public
because he rendered the situation of fighting against terrorism and terrorists
even more harder for the government, his mora righteousness worked perfectly for
individuals and citizens like us because we now know that the U.S government
spies on un and most likely listens to our daily phone conversations, however,
terrorist organizations are the most beneficial , in this case simply because they will be more careful than ever in organizing
their terrorist events, hypothetically Edward Snowden revealed the plumbing and
the way water is being distributed to the people and that is very dangerous,
instead he could have sim.ply said the U.S government spies on us, he actually
went further more and revealed the identity of the person who did this, also if the only intent the governemnt had was to actually ensuring that terrorists should be stopped at the expense of innocent people and have access to our communication means, i concur with them that they can have access to our privacy in this specific scenario.
Principle: Snowden's moral righteousness led to a fantastic secret.
No comments:
Post a Comment