When
(if ever) is it right to intrude on another’s privacy? Is privacy a “right?”
Since 9/11 the word privacy has been thrown around a
lot in relation to when the public learned about the Patriot Act in 2001. I
believe that the government has the right to intrude on someone’s privacy if
that person is believed to be associated with, or suspected of being involved
with terrorists. Privacy is considered by most to be a right, but privacy is
not clearly stated in the U.S. Constitution, however some amendments provide
some protection (ex. Due Process 14th Amendment). While Privacy may
not be clearly stated in the constitution, it is protected by several statutory
laws like HIPAA, or the Privacy Act of 1974. There may be several ways privacy
is protected, but it is truly up to the individual to take the proper steps to
protect his or her own privacy.
Contextualize
your ideas in relation to Allen or Warren and Brandeis.
Anita Allen talks about infringing on another person’s
privacy if they are a child or mentally impaired, because they in fact do not
understand the importance of privacy or have a lack of judgement. Children and
the mentally impaired can be easily taken advantage of and will not realize it
until it is too late. Therefore, parents should always monitor what their
children are doing and most people who are mentally impaired should have a
family member or guardian monitoring them as well.
Discuss
how you could apply your beliefs about privacy to a decision you might have to
make.
I had to apply my beliefs about privacy when I joined
the military because I had to undergo a very long background check which
included being questioned by an investigator. I had a job while I was in the
military that involved me being extremely aware of my surroundings and
safeguarding my own privacy, all while knowing that the government kept an
extra close eye on my activities because of the position I held.
No comments:
Post a Comment