My final project case proposal is about identity theft with
the use of a credit card encoder. Shahab “David” Yousheei stole identities to
open credit cards, used those fraudulent credit cards to buy gift cards, used
those gift cards to buy merchandise (including iPads, cellphones, etc.), and
sold those merchandises with profit. He also tried to buy counterfeit money. He
was arrested for identity theft, credit card fraud, possession of counterfeit
money, and more. The Boston State Police and the U.S. Secret service had set up
an undercover operation due to the large amount of tens of thousands of dollars
involved in this case.
- The buyer did not par take any responsibility to ask seller for selling license. Is it all of the attacker’s fault that people are not protecting their identity?
- Do the credit card companies have any blame for distributing credit cards to stolen identities?
- Should credit card encoders be available to sell to the public? Big companies like Amazon, Ebay, and Google sell them, does the availability give easier access and cheap prices promote the product?
- Who is to blame for the counterfeit money? Who’s selling or who’s buying it? Or, both?
Looks like you're interested in matters of fault and blame. That's definitely important in moral philosophy...let's think more, together, about how to more precisely define these issues. You're on your way, Pink Mystery!
ReplyDeleteHere's something interesting on blame: http://bostonreview.net/forum/barbara-fried-beyond-blame-moral-responsibility-philosophy-law And a really promising book: https://books.google.com/books?id=yRFXPBsDhMAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=blame+its+nature&hl=en&sa=X&ei=c3EtVafvO4WwggT_8oGICQ&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=blame%20its%20nature&f=false
ReplyDelete