Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Final Draft for Final Post: Albert Gonzalez – T.J Maxx

          It is so much easier to pay with a credit/debit card.  Most of us have one, or a few of them. A lot of people don’t like to carry cash with them anymore, and if you need cash, you can easily find an ATM close by, since there are so many around. We also love shopping, and a lot of us use our credit/debit cards to pay for the items we purchase. In order to obtain a Credit/Debit card you have to provide your name, address, social security number, among other personal information to the Bank. So since it’s your personal information, wouldn't you want Companies to protect it when you use your Credit/Debit card to purchase items from them? I would like them to keep my information secure, I hope you would too. But unfortunately when it comes to information security, not all companies and industries are alike.  

Albert Gonzalez was accused of masterminding the combined credit card theft and subsequent reselling of more than 170 million cards and ATM numbers from 2005 through 2007. The biggest such fraud in history. He stole card information from TJX Companies like T.J Maxx, BJ’s Wholesale Club, DSW, Office Max, Boston Market, Barnes & Nobles, and Sports Authority. He hacked stores in different states like New York, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. Gonzalez was arrested on May 7, 2008 and On March 25, 2010, he was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison.

I believe that Albert Gonzalez actions were wrong, and he is guilty as charged, but I have to ask, do you think Albert Gonzalez was the only one at fault? Many would say yes, he is, but I would argue the opposite.

One of the Companies he hacked was T.JX Companies, T.J Maxx and Marshals s are clothing store owned by T.JX that sells designer clothes for a discounted price. Therefor a lot of customers walk in to theirs stores and purchase their items. I am not talking about a Mommy and Daddy owned store, I am talking about a very big company that is making a very good amount of money. But surprisingly they were using out of date and vulnerable security encryption for their machines and networks. I believe that if a person uses their Credit/Debit card at a store for instance, it is the store’s responsibility to keep the information safe. Once I swipe my card thought your credit machine, my card information is stored, so it becomes your property. Probably more than 90% of the customers affected were not aware that their Credit/Debit card information was compromised.
So I ask, why weren't they protecting their costumer’s private information with up to date security? T.JX was using WEP security encryption for their network. Almost every hacker out there likes a challenge, but when the security is outdated and weak is like a day at the park for them. I believed that T.JX should have done a better job at securing their networks and customers information.
Sources:


3 comments:

  1. Strength/Insight/Improvement

    I think you make a good case with this topic. You have a good break down of the case and what the problem was. I believe you are asking why the company passed all the blame when it was at fault as well. Check out this link on a court case that was thrown out and no one was charged due to the company not having its act together:

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftech.mit.edu%2FV128%2FN30%2Fsubway%2FDefcon_Presentation.pdf&ei=mSk4VcTyJYGZsAX-84DYBQ&usg=AFQjCNFmD89S-OAwbAApoGOsr0Vga5lk1w&sig2=Lp6EaVZpjLbuhQGTXcXVJA&bvm=bv.91427555,d.b2w

    Maybe the moral issue to responsibility or just logic comes in to play here. It is the companies responsibility to maintain the logic to keep other peoples confidential information private and safe. Here is some philosophers with that topic: http://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_logic.html

    Hope this helps!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting case, ours is similar when it comes to identity protection. In my case, I believe customers are responsible for protecting their identity when it comes to purchasing from an unlicensed kiosk. In your case, it is a big company and therefore it should be protected by the company with up-to-date security. You explained your point of view, maybe add philosopher's moral views.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This was a really big case! You did a great job in explaining the details of it and I understand alot more of it bow than before. Like me, you should add some philosophers point of views to further back up your argument

    ReplyDelete