For Property Assignment 1 I selected the passage from
Aristotle which was taken from Book 2, part 3 of a series called “Politics”
written in 350 B.C.E.
The first sentence, “That
which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it.”
refers to concept that if a resource which is common to a large segment of the
population is not owned or regulated, then it will not be properly taken care
of and eventually this lack of care can lead to the demise of the resource. Aristotle goes on to say that with a common,
unowned, unregulated, shared resource, people will only be concerned with their
own needs and interest without regard to the needs of others or the
preservation of the common resource.
During my research for this assignment I came across an
article titled “The Tragedy of the Commons” written by Garrett Hardin on June
25, 1968. There was mention of a concept called Creative Commons. I remember
learning about that from the Aaron Swartz story. Arron Swartz played a
significant role in the development of Creative Commons which is a project that
remains significant today. It’s a suite of licenses that artists, writers, and
other creators can use to enable sharing, remixing, and collaboration.
Creative Commons relates to the Aristotle passage in that
someone can have ownership of intellectual property but at the same time it can
be shared by others but not used for the purpose of monetary gain but for the
good on many.
The internet is a shared resource that everyone has access
to but not everyone has control over it. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are
primarily concerned with control over the internet so that they can increase their
profits and minimize competition. "Net neutrality," is the concept
that everyone with an Internet connection should have equal access to all legal
content online. ISPs that also provide cable TV service want to decrease
internet speed for services such as Netflix and Hulu that they compete with. This
relates to Aristotle’s passage in that companies such as Comcast want to control
and monopolize a common resource without regard to the common good of all but
only to minimize competition and increase their profits
The internet has simultaneously been described as a modern
wonder and a cesspool. Obviously these are two extreme ends of the spectrum. In
the previously mention article titled “The Tragedy of the Commons”, misuse of a
resource such as the sea in relation to over fishing is mentioned. If no one
owns a commonly used resource that we all rely upon, the users may be inclined
to only take for themselves without regard for the common good of the resource
and the needs of others. This brings forth the question of whether or not a
government should regulate the internet and to what degree.
No comments:
Post a Comment