In the article, The
Right to Privacy, by Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis, the importance
of the privacy of an individual and his/her property (tangible and intangible)
is discussed. If the authors of this article were alive today, they would one again
render the fact on page 196 that “The press is overstepping in every direction
the obvious bounds of propriety and of decency. Gossip is no longer the
resource of the idle and of the vicious, but has become a trade.…It belittles by
inverting the relative importance of things, thus dwarfing the thoughts and
aspirations of a people.” The San Bernardino shooters murdered fourteen people,
and injured twenty-one, but what about the other shooters that aren’t Muslim? White
mass killers are never called “terrorists” by the media. The media never blew
up the shooting at the Charleston church where Dylann Storm Roof killed nine
African Americans, or Robert Lewis Dear who opened fire at
a Planned Parenthood Clinic. They were not slandered like these two
Muslim shooters are by the media. White male privilege is obvious, but it is
not recognized. It is easier to see the faults of racial minorities and women
than the prevalence of white males. Maybe because it is taught that it
shouldn’t be acknowledged because there is guilt that comes with societal
entitlement. How many shootings have been by white males and how many have been
by racial minorities? Since 1982, “mentally ill” white men have committed 64%
of the shootings. The media exploited the San Bernardino shooters, and their
personal information because of their religion and the color of their skin. Television
networks, journalists, Reuters employees, and neighbors were freely allowed to
enter the home of the Malik family. The landlord broke open the lock on the
door and let random people enter. Is that even legal? The press is definitely overstepping decency. Family
photos were rummaged on live TV. The media has exposed every single detail of
their life on the news. FBI case with Apple is not even about trying to get to ISIS,
it is about getting authority. Cracking into the information of this one phone
is not going to make a difference because the shooters are still going to be
dead and still “linked” to ISIS. Are we not already trying to stop ISIS? This
information is not going to decide if we are still going to terminate ISIS. The
media’s bigot bullsh*t and breeding hatred is not going to stop ISIS either. As
stated in the article, “When personal gossip attains the dignity of print, and
crowds the space available for matters of real interest to the community, what
wonder that the ignorant and thoughtless mistake its relative importance…” on
page 196. The FBI let everyone know what they were doing with the phone, what
makes you think that they won’t let the data on the phone spread to the media?
The FBI exposed every detail on the Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s life, as well as his family and deceased
brother’s. The media is there to appease and captivate those that are curious
and ignorant enough to buy into this. The FBI cannot be trusted.
No comments:
Post a Comment