Warren
and Brandeis introduce the example of publishing a private letter. Why do
they introduce this example? How does it help them move along their
arguments about the right to privacy? Do you agree with their claim based
on this example? Why?
They
introduce the letter example to provide a foundation of an example to show how
privacy is important. The example of a letter helps show that something someone
makes should be kept private and not forced to be made public. Warren and Brandeis state “The right to
privacy does not prohibit any publication of matter which is of public or
general interest…The design of the law must be to protect those persons with
whose affairs the community has no legitimate concern, from being dragged into
an undesirable and undesired publicity and to protect all persons, whatsoever;
their position or station, from having matters which they may properly prefer
to keep private, made public against their will.” I agree that if someone
writes a private letter than they should have a say whether it is fine or not
to publish it. They put in the time and effort to draft the letter and if the
author knew it would be published with or without their consent they would have
made provisions while drafting the letter to make sure it would not harm their
reputation. If what someone believes in or something they take part in does not
harm another individual or cause direct harm to the general community then they
should have a right to privacy and a right to determine if they want their
letter or actions made public.
No comments:
Post a Comment